Background Image
Previous Page  348 / 432 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 348 / 432 Next Page
Page Background

R. EMERJ, Rio de Janeiro, v. 20, n. 79, p. 348 - 376, Maio/Agosto 2017

348

Third-Party Contracts,

Legal Retroactivity,

and Punitive Damages:

From Europe to Latin America

1

Ángel R. Oquendo

George J. and Helen M. England Professor of Law,

University of Connecticut; CAPES Visiting Professor

from Abroad, Federal & State Universities of Rio de

Janeiro; DAAD Visiting Professor, Free Universities of

Berlin; Ph.D. & M.A. (Philosophy), A.B. (Economics

and Philosophy), Harvard University; J.D., Yale Law

School. The author himself has translated the quoted

non-English texts and vouches for the accuracy of the

translation. He would like to thank Claudia Schubert

for her invaluable contribution to the development of

the ideas of this article. An earlier version appeared

as Civil Law Pulsations Along the Latin American

Periphery, 48 Inter-Am. L. Rev. 87-124 (2016).

Abstract

: The civil-law system shows its true face as it travels from

the Continental European core to the Latin American periphery. Many

of the principal institutions have found a home and thrived in the new

and radically different environment. One can best study them there by

contemplating how they have preserved some of their most basic features

despite having transformed themselves into something else.

The notion of the civil-law tradition and that of codification have

themselves undergone this dialectic of transformation and preservation. So

have the traditional approach to contractual interpretation and to third-party

agreements and the common proscriptions on retroactivity and punitive

damages. In Latin America, as well as in Continental Europe, the intent of

the parties typically takes precedence over the text of the contract and an

agreement normally may benefit a third party despite the general restriction

on extra-party effects. Similarly, a relatively strict ban on the retroactive

application of statutes and on the imposition of punitive damages prevails

on both sides of the Atlantic.

1 A EMERJ disponibiliza a versão traduzida deste artigo através do e-mail:

revistadaemerj@tjrj.jus.br