Revista da EMERJ - V. 23 - N. 3 - Setembro/Dezembro - 2021

182  R. EMERJ, Rio de Janeiro, v. 23, n. 3, p. 181-215, Set.-Dez. 2021  cebidas para justificar o dito afastamento excepcional da regra nos casos em que sua aplicação subsuntiva produziria resultado incompatível com a Constituição, buscando destacar a compati- bilidade entre a finalidade usualmente subjacente às propostas desenvolvidas na doutrina constitucionalista e os postulados da metodologia do Direito Civil-Constitucional. O estudo adota o método lógico-dedutivo, a partir de pesquisa bibliográfica e ju- risprudencial acerca do Direito brasileiro. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: 1. Direito Civil-Constitucional. 2. Controle de constitucionalidade. 3. Regras e princípios. 4. Pon- deração. 5. Derrotabilidade. ABSTRACT: The scope of this study is to promote a dia- logue between the methodology of civil-constitutional law and the Brazilian system of constitutionality review, with special fo- cus on the constitutionalist doctrine proposals aimed at justifying the exceptional overcoming of a legal rule-norm. In this endeav- or, certain theoretical premises relevant to the present study will be delimited, notably with regard to the relationship between the notions of normative statement and norm with the notion of concrete case order, as well as the current understanding of the rules and principles as distinct (although complementary) normative species, both subject to the incidence of the balancing technique. Afterwards, some aspects related to the insufficiency of the abstract control of constitutionality will be reviewed. In the end, the study will review the main theoretical propositions designed to justify the said exceptional overcoming of the rule in cases where its strict application would produce a result in- compatible with the Constitution, seeking to highlight the com- patibility between the purpose usually underlying the proposals developed in constitutionalist doctrine and the postulates of the methodology of civil-constitutional law. The study adopts the logical-deductive method, based on bibliographic and jurispru- dential research regarding Brazilian law. KEYWORDS: 1. Civil-Constitutional Law. 2. Constitution- al review. 3. Rules and principles. 4. Balance. 5. Defeasibility.