Revista da EMERJ - V. 22 - N.2 - Maio/Agosto - 2020
R. EMERJ, Rio de Janeiro, v. 22, n. 2, p. 91 - 150, Maio-Agosto. 2020 146 EIDENMÜLLER, Horst. Effizienz als Rechtsprinzip . 3. Ed. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2005. FACHIN Luiz Edson. AReforma no Direito Brasileiro: novas notas sobre um velho debate no direito civil. In: FACHIN, Luiz Edson e TEPEDINO, Gustavo (Org.). Obrigações e Contratos – obrigações: estrutura e dogmática . São Paulo: Revista dos Tri- bunais, 2001, p. 229-236 (coleção doutrinas essenciais, v. 1). FEINBERG, Joel. Legal Paternalism, Canadian Journal of Philosophy , v. 1, n. 1, p. 105-124, set. 1971. FRANKENBERG, Günter. Tyrannei der Würde? Para- doxien und Parodien eines Höchstwertes. In: do mesmo autor (Org.). Autorität und Integration .Suhrkamp, p. 270-282, 2003. FULLER, Lon L. Positivism and Fidelity to Law: AReply to Professor Hart, Harvard Law Review 71 , p. 630–672, 1958. GORDLEY, James; MEHREN, Arthur Taylon Von. An intro- duction to the comparative study of private law: readings, cases, materials . New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006. GORDLEY, James. Foundations of private law. Proper- ty, tort, contract, unjust enrichment. New York: Oxford Uni- versity Press, 2006. GREEN, Leslie. Law as a means. In: CANE, Peter (Ed.). The Hart-Fuller Debate in the Twenty-First Century . Oxford and Portland: Hart, 2010. Disponível em: <http://ssrn.com/abs- tract=1351304>. Acesso em: 5 ago. 2015. HABERMAS, Jürgen. Faktizität und Geltung. 4. ed. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1994. HART, H.L.A. The Concept of Law . Oxford [u.a.]: Oxford University Press, 1961. ______. Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals. Harvard Law Review , p. 593-629, 1998. HENRY, Leslie Meltzer. The Jurisprudence of dignity. Uni- versity of Pennsylvania Law Review , v. 160, set. 2011. Disponível em: <http://ssrn.com/abstract =1928768>. Acesso em: 5 ago. 2015. HESSE, Konrad. A Força Normativa da Constituição . Trad. Gilmar Mendes. Porto Alegre: Sérgio Antônio Fabris, 1991.
Made with FlippingBook
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NTgyODMz