Revista da EMERJ - V. 21 - N. 2 - Maio/Agosto - 2019

39  R. EMERJ, Rio de Janeiro, v. 21, n. 2, p. 11-39, Maio-Agosto, 2019  In the current scholarly discussion in Italy the proposal to establish a single ordinary courts system is once again gaining traction. 113 Turning to the relationship between court specialization and effi- ciency, attention should be drawn to the specialized sections of ordinary courts. As the Constitution of 1948 banned the creation of new special courts, the need for a degree of expertise in certain matters ought to be satisfied by the establishment of specialized sections within the ordinary courts (e.g., specialized agricultural sections, juvenile courts). 114 A new turn in the history of specialized courts is the establishment of “enterprises” courts in 2012, but an indepth analysis of this novelty should remain for another day. 115 113 Cf., among others, A. Proto Pisani , L’importanza dell’articolo 113, 3° comma Costituzione, per una giustizia effettiva del cittadino contro atti della Pubblica amministrazione, in Questione giustizia, 2015, p. 149ff. 114 M. De Cristofaro, N. Trocker (eds.), Civil Justice in Italy, p. 40. 115 Cf. Law no. 27 of 2012. Cf. P. Comoglio , Il giudice specializzato in materia di impresa.