Direito em Movimento - Volume 16 - Número 2 - 2º semestre/2018

98 Direito em Movimento, Rio de Janeiro, v. 16 - n. 2, p. 72-105, 2º sem. 2018 ARTIGOS transformed together. Constitutional Law does not begin where Interna- tional Law ends. The opposite is also valid, since International Law does not end where Constitutional Law begins. 45 ” This interaction is also important to overcome lack of confidence over internal policies resulting from the erosion of the absolute concept of State sovereignty and submission to an external nucleus of power. In the past the institutionalization of human rights, in the guise of an international con- cern, was an activity reserved for larger States – an instrument for ideology, domination and imposition of their own interests and agendas. The symbiosis between internal law and international norms has pro- duced doctrines which seek to understand this process of interaction and, in this way, overcome its antinomies. Highlighted here is the inter-con- stitutionalism of Canotilho 46 , treating the matter through the lens of multi-leveled constitutionalism and through the transnational character of fundamental rights (interjusfundamentality), based on the experience of the European Tribunal of Human Rights. In turn, Marcelo Neves studies the problem in the light of transconstitutionalism 47 , by which he searches for rationality for the problem of variations derived from the application of fundamental rights amongst diverse peoples. Zagrebelski 48 , for his part, speaks of the adaptable constitution to try to explain the decentralization of the state and reflect upon its juridical pluralismo. Häberle, not intending to place internal law on an inferior level, ela- borates his theory based on common communitarian law and the princi- ples which result from it, with a consideration which gravitates around the concept of pluralism founded in the guarantee and protection of liberties which increasingly comes to be the regulatory axis of the system. 45 HÄBERLE, Peter. Estado constitucional cooperativo . Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2007, p. 11-12. 46 CANOTILHO, Joaquim José Gomes. Brancosos e Interconstitucionalidade . Coimbra: Almedina, 2006. 47 NEVES, Marcelo. Transconstitucionalismo . São Paulo. Martins Fontes.2009 48 ZAGREBELSKY, Gustavo. El derechoductil : ley, derechos y justicia. Madrid: Trotta, 1995.